Danial latifi and another v. union of india
WebJul 15, 2024 · The learned council argued that keeping in view the decisions of this Court e.g. D.P. Joshi & Anr vs. The State of Madhya Bharat & Another, Dr. Jagadish Saran and Ors. v. Union of India and Dr. Pradeep Jain Etc. vs. Union of India, it must be held that reservation by way institutional preference has held the field for a long time. WebJul 19, 2024 · In the case of fertilizer Corporation Kamgar v Union Of India And Others [1], the Judges have tried to broaden the scope of “locus standi” in respect to Article 32 [2] of the Constitution of India. The scope has now been increased from “aggrieved” person to “any” person fighting for a proper cause. In this Judgement, Justice Krishna ...
Danial latifi and another v. union of india
Did you know?
WebJun 28, 2024 · To overcome the ratio of the said decision, the present Act has been enacted and Section 3 (1) (a) is not in discord with the personal law. 11. Shri Y.H. Muchhala, learned Senior Advocate appearing for the All-India Muslim Personal Law Board submitted that the main object of the Act is to undo Shah Bano case. WebSep 28, 2001 · Danial Latifi & Anr. Vs. Union of India. by Court Verdict ... of construction a given statute will become ‘ultra vires’ or ‘unconstitutional’ and, therefore, void, whereas another construction which is permissi-ble, the statute remains effective and operative, the court will prefer the latter on the ground that Legislature does not ...
http://courtverdict.com/supreme-court-of-india/danial-latifi-anr-vs-union-of-india
WebDanial Latifi v. Union of IndiaAIR 2001 SC 3958One of the counsels of Shah Bano’s, Danial Latifi challenged the act, Protection of Rights on Divorce on the basis of its constitutional validity under Article 14 and 15 of the Constitution of India. Following the landmark judgment in Shah Bano's case, Muslim personal law was in a state of disarray. WebNov 10, 2024 · Danial Latifi & Anr v. Union of India (2001) 7 SCC 740 (India). India has a uniform criminal code, but different personal codes addressing family law for various …
WebThe petitioner claims that the Union of India is a joint tort-feasor and since the Central government owns 22% share in UCIL thus the central government is being a judge in its own case. Moreover, the Government only permitted the establishment of the factories without any necessary safeguards, thus it has no locus standi to compromise on ...
WebJan 23, 2024 · The Danial Latifi v.Union of India case (2001) highlights tensions between the pressure of communal politics and the promotion of gender equity for Muslim women … iom bus faresWebJul 15, 2024 · Union of India. Petitioner- Danial Latifi & Anr. Respondent- Union of India. Statutes Referred-The Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act, 1986 (the … iomb scheduleWebSep 28, 2001 · Danial Latifi v/s Union of India Writ Petition (C) No. 868 of 1986 Decided On, 28 September 2001. At, Supreme Court of India By, THE HONOURABLE MR. ... A … on target in ashville ncWebSep 19, 2024 · Danial Latifi V Union Of India. The constitutionality of the Act was challenged in Danial Latifi. It was contended by the petitioners that the Act was less … on target impressionsWebNov 11, 2024 · The case of Danial Latifi v. Union of India was a landmark case in the Indian legal history in multiple aspects. Not only did the Court find itself in a quagmire … on target infant trainingWebDanial Latifi v. Union of India. Under Islamic law maintenance or Nafaqa (Nafqa) arise out of three reasons - i) marriage ii) relations and iii) property. Maintenance in this context … on target in ashevillehttp://feministlawarchives.pldindia.org/danial-latifi-and-another-v-union-of-india-supreme-court-of-india-28-sep-2001/ on target in canton